Archive for 2012

Taking Psychometric Tests with a Hearing Impairment

How might a hearing impairment affect your performance?

People with hearing difficulties may be disadvantaged in job selection processes which use psychometric tests to identify the most able candidates. Hearing problems can impact test performance in many ways. For example, candidates may struggle to understand the verbal instructions which often accompany psychometric tests. Furthermore, people who have been without hearing from childhood and primarily use sign language may be less familiar with the English language and, therefore, particularly disadvantaged on tests requiring reading (e.g. verbal reasoning tests) and writing.

How can employers help?

In line with the Disability and Discrimination Act 1995, employers are required to make necessary amendments to ensure candidates with hearing impairments are not disadvantaged by selection processes.  The British Psychological Society (BPS) has yet to develop specific guidelines for testing hearing impaired candidates; however, they outline some of the main considerations in their publication: Psychometric Testing for people with a hearing impairment (BPS, 2010). Here, the BPS recommends that employers:

  • Seek advice from test publishers in regard to what amendments can be made.
  • Make any adjustments on a case by case basis, according to the specific needs of the candidate.
  • Use sign language interpreters for giving instructions and facilitating the test environment but not for interpreting questions on written tests.
  • Provide written instructions if candidates are able to read.
  • Offer candidates practice questions, in order to anticipate potential test difficulties.

How can you help?

If you have a hearing impairment, it is vital that you inform the employer as far in advance as possible, so that they can make the necessary arrangements for you. Try and be specific about the nature of your hearing difficulty and what aids could help you. You might also like to familiarise yourself with the different types of psychometric tests you will be expected to take so that you can anticipate what adjustments would be most helpful to you.  At AssessmentDay you can download a range of practice tests, including verbal reasoning tests, numerical reasoning tests and inductive reasoning tests.

AssessmentDay Founder Mentors Enterprise Students

26th-27th March AssessmentDay support entrepreneurs’ boot camp at the University of Essex.

Oliver Savill from AssessmentDay joined other entrepreneurs and business gurus to sit on the panel of a Dragons’ Den style competition run by the University of Essex for budding entrepreneurs. Five teams comprising students from the University of Essex each pitched their business ideas to the dragons in a bid to receive £1,500 seed funding. The teams took part in a two-day boot camp where they could develop their ideas with the mentors and listen to talks from successful entrepreneurs. The talks included one on innovation presented by Oliver Savill from AssessmentDay.  Other speakers included Marcelle Speller founder of localgiving.com, Robert Jackson director of Dracks Healthcare and Dr Gwyn Jones director of Corptec.

Santander sponsored the prize money, which was presented to the winning team at the end of the two-day boot camp. The wining team’s business focuses on low-cost tutoring services.

Practice Test Session at Bank of Americal Merill Lynch

23rd February 2012: Delegates attend a practice test session as part of a The Knowledge Channel workshop.

As part of a workshop organised by The Knowledge Channel, Oliver Savill from AssessmentDay facilitated a practice test session at Bank of America Merill Lynch’s headquarters in Canary Wharf. Around 60 delegates attended the session which involved two numerical practice tests. Delegates took the first numerical test before being given tips and advice about taking numerical reasoning tests. They then took a second practice test to put into practice the advice presented by AssessmentDay. Most delegates reported a small rise in their test score, and they certainly learnt more about the recruitment testing process.

For more information about this event, including having AssessmentDay facilitate a similar event, please contact us on 02074 333166 or info@assessmentday.co.uk.

What is a Situational Judgement Test?

What do Situational Judgement Tests Involve?

There has been an increasing use of Situational Judgement Tests (SJTs) within recruitment and selection processes over the last 15 years, particularly by large employers offering competitive graduate schemes.  Typically, SJTs are computer-based and consist of multiple-choice questions drawn from real-life job scenarios which have been designed by experts in the relevant field. Candidates are required to evaluate or rank different response options according to their effectiveness. SJTs are often combined with aptitude tests (e.g. numerical reasoning, verbal reasoning and inductive reasoning), personality questionnaires and other job-simulation tasks (e.g. in-tray or e-tray exercises).

What do SJTs Show Employers?

SJTs are multi-dimensional, psychological assessment tools. Candidates’ responses are believed to reflect many different facets; such as their general knowledge, common-sense, previous life experience, decision-making and problem-solving skills. SJTs are also believed to tap non-cognitive skills, such as personality traits, professional attitudes and ethics.  Unlike aptitude tests, SJTs are said to provide employers with an insight into how candidates would function practically on the job.

Tackling your Situational Judgement Test

SJTs vary according to the specific job role and the competencies required for that position. Therefore, in preparing for the test it is useful to establish what core skills the recruiter is likely to be looking for and to have these in your mind when answering the questions.

Unlike aptitude tests, SJTs are rarely timed. Take advantage of this by ensuring that you read all the information carefully before answering, whilst being mindful not to spend too much time over-thinking each item.  Practicing these tests will enhance your familiarity with the SJT format and enable you to develop your own test technique. With this in mind, we at AssessmentDay have designed practice tests to help get you ready for your Situational Judgement Test.

Study Claims Link Between Facebook Profile and Job Performance

The aim of psychometric tests used in recruitment is to get a clearer understanding of someone and how they will perform in a job. Interviews are one way of predicting how well a potential employee might get on, but interviews are notoriously hit-and-miss and occasionally bordering on useless as a job performance indicator. Step up psychometrics: a more objective, fair, reliable measure of future job performance.

So it is with great interest that we heard about a study claiming to use people’s Facebook profile to build a personality profile of applicants. The study has been compiled by the Northern Illinois University, the University of Evansville and Auburn University. The study used human resource professionals to analyse the Facebook profiles of 56 people.

The best way to build a personality profile is to ask the respondent a series of questions, with scales of how well they agree or disagree with each statement. This new study claims to be able to grade people on the ‘Big Five’ personality scale not through questionnaires but through looking at their Facebook profile for around 10 minutes. The personality factors measured are often referred to as: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism.

Ten minutes? Facebook profile? Interesting idea but we’re back to bordering on useless. In fact, the results of any attempt to map a Facebook profile to someone’s Big Five personality traits might be worse than useless; they’re probably misleading. Careers and employment are issues to be taken seriously and are to be given thorough consideration on the part of both the employer and employee.

We welcome all attempts to predict future job performance of applicants, but this idea should remain in the ‘work in progress’ pile.

Seeking Feedback after Taking Psychometric Tests

Gaining feedback after you have completed psychometric tests can be extremely valuable when you are going through the job selection process. Whether you have been offered the position or not, it is always beneficial to know your strengths and weaknesses, particularly if you are looking to improve your performance on future assessments.  Some recruiters may write to you with your test results, or arrange an individual feedback session face-to-face or over the telephone. However, many organisations are unable to do this on account of time constraints. This can often be true of large graduate employers who deal with vast numbers of potential candidates and large volumes of test results.

Asking recruiters for feedback

It is always worth trying to get feedback from the employer by contacting them directly, via email or in writing. You may like to try requesting a written report of your test results. It is also good practice to enquire in advance about an employer’s feedback processes if you know you will be completing psychometric tests, and the employer should provide you with feedback as a matter of courtesy and good practice. Employers abiding by the British Psychological Society guidelines on psychometric testing (i.e. most employers) have agreed to provide feedback to candidates, so you are perfectly within your right to ask for it.

Evaluating your own performance

In the absence of feedback from the employer, you may need to rely on self-evaluation. In doing so, it is important that you think constructively about your performance across each of the psychometric tests you completed. Ask yourself what your strengths and your weakness were and what you might have done differently next time around. For example:

  • How was your pacing? Did you spend too much time on the early questions and compromise the latter ones?
  • Did you struggle to make sense of the symbols or diagrams used in the numerical reasoning test?
  • Were you familiar with the vocabulary used in the verbal reasoning test?
  • Was there anything that felt easier or more enjoyable? What tests do you not need as much practice on next time?

Your answers will give you some clues as to what you need to practice in advance of future assessments. But be warned – we are often our own worst critics, so use the self-evaluation approach with caution and be sure to always pick out the strengths in your performance.

Making The Assessment Centre Work For You

What happens at assessment centres?

Assessment centres involve the extensive evaluation of candidates for an extended period of time; sometimes lasting one or two days. During this period candidates undertake a range of exercises and activities which typically include: interviews, presentations, aptitude tests, personality tests, group-exercises, and in-tray exercises.

Graduate employers are increasingly using assessment centres as part of their selection process as it allows them to broadly assess the aptitude of their candidates, as well as their ability to thrive in real-life work situations. Furthermore, informal social events throughout the assessment day provide employers with an additional insight into the social and communicative skills of candidates.

Some top tips for the big day

Facing a one or two day barrage of assessments is likely to be an anxiety provoking prospect for any candidate. However, there are many things you can do to get yourself psychologically and practically prepared!

Firstly – try and find out from the organisation what kinds of test you will be doing. You may already be able to guess from the type of position you are applying to. Forewarned is forearmed!

Try and get lots of practice in – it will do wonders for your performance and will help you overcome some of the anxious thoughts and feelings that might otherwise cloud you on the big day. You might like to take a look at our pack of expert tips and real-life examples of assessment centre exercises, as well as our range of psychometric practice tests.

Finally – keep in mind that the assessment centre can be an excellent opportunity to demonstrate your breadth of skills. So, if you don’t perform as you had hoped on one particular exercise, you may have the chance to make it up in another area!

Tackling the group exercise

What’s involved?

For many organisations, it is vital that their employees have the ability to communicate with others and to work well within teams. For this reason, employers regularly include some form of group exercise when inviting candidates to the assessment centre. This will often be in addition to individual assessments such as interviews, personality tests and aptitude tests (e.g. verbal reasoning, numerical reasoning and inductive reasoning).

Group exercises can vary considerably and may include role plays, case studies, topical discussions and problem-solving tasks.  For example, you might be required to take part in a discussion about an issue relating to the organisation and be allocated a particular role to adopt (e.g. company director). Alternatively, you might be asked to solve a business or ethical dilemma, to plan a project within a given budget or to get creative and build a physical structure together as a team.

How should you approach it?

The range of different scenarios you could face may seem rather daunting, but rest assured, there are some key things you can do to ensure you succeed in any group exercise:

  • Be sure to communicate your ideas clearly, calmly and logically.
  • Always remember to actively listen to others in your group – this means attending carefully, summarising and clarifying their ideas.
  • Make sure your opinions are heard but also take the time to enable other’s to contribute – facilitation is a sophisticated and much sought after skill!
  • Go back to basics – remember the art of conversation: keep appropriate eye contact, take turns, try not to interrupt and never raise your voice.

Get more top tips

To get you ready for the big day, we have developed an extensive Assessment Centre candidate preparation pack which includes expert tips from the assessors themselves and real-life examples of group-exercises.


Visual Impairment and Taking Psychometric Tests

What is visual impairment and why does it cause difficulties?

Visual impairment refers to a wide spectrum of sight difficulties and can range from partial sightedness through to blindness. A visually impaired person is considered to have irretrievable loss or distortion of vision which may be improved but not easily corrected by glasses or contact lenses.

The highly visual nature of psychometric tests is likely to present a visually impaired candidate with difficulties. For example, they may struggle to read the instructions, see the test stimuli, scan text, switch focus and discriminate between different colours (colour blindness). As such, these candidates may be unfairly disadvantaged across a large majority of aptitude tests; including numerical reasoning, verbal reasoning, inductive reasoning, as well as more real-life tasks, such as the in-tray exercise.

How can employers help?

Under the Disability and Discrimination Act 1995 and the Equality Act 2010, employers are required to make necessary amendments to ensure that their selection processes do not discriminate against persons who have significantly impaired vision.  The amendments that employers make to psychometric tests will largely depend on the tools and strategies that the candidate is already familiar with. Furthermore, employers must be careful not to make adjustments which invalidate the test. Examples of adjustments might include:

  • Using Braille in place of text
  • Transcribing tests into audio versions
  • Using assistants to read out text and record answers
  • Using larger fonts or magnification screens and devices

These amendments may lengthen response times and so candidates may need to be awarded extra time.

What do the psychometric testing guidelines say?

The British Psychological Society (BPS) has developed guidelines to advise those administering psychometric tests with people who are visually impaired:  Visual Impairment and Psychometric Testing (BPS, 2007). The BPS recommends that employers investigate the nature and severity of the visual impairment and consult with chartered psychologists or test publishers before making any test amendments.

Click here to read the full guidelines: Visual Impairment

Preparing for Your In-Tray Exercise

In this tough economic climate, employers want to be certain that the candidate they select is the right person for the job. Employers are therefore eager to recruit individuals who demonstrate their ability to thrive in real-life work situations. For this reason, if you are applying for a popular job, you may be asked to attend an assessment centre to complete an in-tray exercise.

In-tray exercises form part of a wider battery of psychometric and aptitude testing. In essence, they assess your Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes (known in the recruitment industry as ‘KSA’) across a range of situations which simulate real-life work demands. The competencies tested will be determined by the employing organisation and the requirements of the particular vacancy. However, it is common for in-tray exercises to involve the sorting, analysing and prioritising of complex information under a given time-constraint. For example, you may be given a pile of documents to read, prioritise and action. Increasingly popular are the computer-based versions of this exercise (known as e-tray or inbox exercises) which often involve managing incoming emails.

In-tray exercises may feel somewhat unfamiliar compared to psychometric tests; which are more akin to the exam-type scenarios of school days. Further still, unlike aptitude tests, it is not just your answers that count – you may also be assessed on your behaviour and demeanour when undertaking the in-tray exercise.  At AssessmentDay, we believe that preparation and practice can maximise your performance on tasks, particularly when they are novel to you.  This is why we offer free in-tray exercises, with solutions, as well as expert tips on how to approach them.

Dyslexia and Psychometric Testing for Employers

Employers must be careful not to unlawfully discriminate using psychometric tests

The Disability Discrimination Act, which came into force in 1995, requires employers to make reasonable adjustments to ensure a fair selection process for potential candidates.  Given the growing popularity of aptitude tests within selection procedures, employers are expected to accommodate the needs of candidates whose test performance may be impacted by sensory impairments or other conditions.

People with dyslexia may be particularly disadvantaged by psychometric tests. Dyslexia is most commonly associated with impaired literacy skills; however, people may also present with difficulties in memory and speed of processing. As such, it is acknowledged that these candidates are at risk of performing poorly on psychometric tests if necessary amendments are not made, particularly on literacy-based tests (e.g. verbal reasoning tests).  The inherent danger is that candidates with dyslexia will not be given the opportunity to demonstrate their true abilities, and therefore, their suitability for the vacant position.

What do the psychometric testing guidelines say?

With this in mind, the British Psychology Society (BPS) has developed guidelines to advise those administering psychometric tests to people with dyslexia: Dyslexia and Occupational Testing (BPS, 2006). This document recommends that employers:

  • Provide all candidates with the opportunity to discuss difficulties that might impact on their test performance.
  • Ask candidates with dyslexia about the specific nature and severity of their difficulties.
  • Consider making necessary amendments which are specific to the individual needs of the candidate, e.g. additional time.
  • Consult with a chartered psychologist or with the test publishers to discuss potential amendments which will not invalidate the test.
  • Consider alternative methods of assessing the same skill, e.g. real-life work situations.

Click on the link to read the BPS guidelines in full: Dyslexia and Occupational Testing.